<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank of America Website Verification Meaningless to Users</title>
	<link>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/</link>
	<description>Articles on effective experience design and internet marketing.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ranndino</title>
		<link>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-49953</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-49953</guid>
					<description>The Site Key system cannot be more simple to understand and works great for people who are in possession of a functioning brain. It's almost impossible to design something for people who ignore every attempt to protect them. What can be simpler than saying, if you don't see the image you picked do not enter your password? The problem is not with how this was designed, but with the fact that most people border on retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Site Key system cannot be more simple to understand and works great for people who are in possession of a functioning brain. It&#8217;s almost impossible to design something for people who ignore every attempt to protect them. What can be simpler than saying, if you don&#8217;t see the image you picked do not enter your password? The problem is not with how this was designed, but with the fact that most people border on retarded.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimmy Paluch</title>
		<link>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-6663</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 04:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-6663</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the comments! It is a very interesting problem that unfortunately has some problematic solutions currently being implemented. I too admit to being completely confused despite having experience with this from my programming days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments! It is a very interesting problem that unfortunately has some problematic solutions currently being implemented. I too admit to being completely confused despite having experience with this from my programming days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-6485</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-6485</guid>
					<description>I had no idea how SiteKey websites worked.  I would probably be one of those 92% of users who didn't understand what was going on.  Good article :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea how SiteKey websites worked.  I would probably be one of those 92% of users who didn&#8217;t understand what was going on.  Good article <img src='http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: P.J. Onori</title>
		<link>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-5494</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/bank-of-america-website-verification-meaningless-to-users/#comment-5494</guid>
					<description>Long time, no comment - my apologies. :) 

Very interesting to say the least - I never really understood this tactic and, frankly, it seems somewhat useless. I can definitely see how people would not make that connection.

Nice writeup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time, no comment - my apologies. <img src='http://www.paradymesolutions.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Very interesting to say the least - I never really understood this tactic and, frankly, it seems somewhat useless. I can definitely see how people would not make that connection.</p>
<p>Nice writeup!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
